I’ve been following, with great interest, the debate going on in the U.S. about TSA airport screenings. I’ve read a number of opinions suggesting prescriptions for maintaining security and restoring a bit of privacy to the travel process. Some articles have discussed a move towards the sort of screening that Israel does. So, having gone through Israeli airport security, I thought I’d write again about the experience for you here.
But first, let me attempt to put a frame around this debate.
Israel is, in many ways, the model for safe flying. With the story I’ll recount below, you’ll understand why a person would feel safe boarding an Israeli airplane. It’s important to remember that airport security is a sliding scale. The discussion isn’t about whether we want to stay safe when we travel. It’s about HOW safe we want to be and how much we’re willing to give up in order to achieve that security. On one extreme, we could abolish screenings all together. On the other end, we could mandate that travelers fly in hospital gowns without carry-ons. Since we’re unlikely to do either, today’s discussion is about where on the scale we, as a nation, want to land.
For years, airport screenings have been moving in the direction of greater security (though some would dispute that claim) and less privacy. Put another way, we’ve been slowly moving towards the Israeli model.
The El Al check-in counters are in a corner of Heathrow, giving security wide berth to operate without the hassle of random passersby. When I approached the area this June, for my London to Tel Aviv flight, a security agent met me several yards before I even reached the check-in area. He was Israeli, not British.
He asked to see my passport. I handed it over to him, and he studied it, taking his time over visas from Yemen, Syria, Lebanon, the UAE, etc. It didn’t take him long to escort me to the additional screening line. Now, to remind you, this wasn’t at the standard security checkpoint, this was prior to checking in.
I waited in a line filled with other foreigners, including one visibly annoyed Indian. Others, like the Hasidic Jews, proceeded through check-in normally.
After waiting for 15 minutes, another security agent asked me a couple of questions and quickly escorted me to a back room for further screening. I waited for an hour as my bags were scanned and searched in another room. I was checking my backpack, filled with clothes and book, and carrying on a small duffel with all my electronics.
Eventually, one of the agents appeared (they were all exceedingly professional) and informed me that I wouldn’t be allowed to fly with any carry-on baggage. That’s ridiculous, I protested. The only items that can fly under a plane but not in the passenger cabin are things like knives and liquids. I asked, rhetorically, if they had found any of those in my carry-on.
Once I realized there was no arguing, I explained to the agent that I wasn’t prepared to check all of my electronics (computer, cameras, etc.) and risk them disappearing. I said that I wanted to be able to carry my computer, book, and iPod onboard with me. The rest they could check. Nope, she said. I could have the book and the iPod, but not the computer.
At this point, for fear of missing my flight, I accepted El Al’s terms and sprinted for the gate. I made it through British security in a snap and proceeded to the gate at the end of the terminal. Once there, a security agent again pulled me aside and told me that my backpack wouldn’t be allowed to fly at all. It hadn’t passed explosives screening.
I couldn’t believe it. I had been forced to check my carry-on, and the bag I had intended to check couldn’t fly at all. The bag would be sent to a flight simulator overnight, the agent explained, and would be shipped on to Tel Aviv the following day.
The agent then told me I’d been selected for addition screening. He took me into a private room and ordered me to drop my pants. Determined to get on the damn plane, I did as I was told. I was wanded from head to toe. The man even made sure to pat the elastic of my underwear. My book, iPod, shoes, and belt were all tested for explosives before I was allowed to board.
The really interesting part of the journey, though, came in Tel Aviv—after the flight—where I was put through an intense interview in a private office off the immigration hall. This, I would soon understand, was the part where trained agents are looking for behavioral signs that could indicate a person is lying or scared.
I turned out to be an interview subject worthy of the training manual. I was sweating, fidgeting, turning uncomfortably in my seat, and stumbling over my words. Part of the reason for this was typical American self-righteousness. They’re questioning ME? Part of it was that my computer had been sitting by the baggage carousel for over an hour, and I began to worry that I’d never see it again.
The man and woman in the office began quizzing me. Why did I live in Egypt? Did I speak Arabic? Did I know anyone in Israel? What was my email address? Why had I visited so many Arab countries, while this was only my second visit to Israel?
And then the one that made me mad: Why had I covered the Israel-Hamas war from Gaza? Did I not want to write about what the Israelis were going through? Of course, this called my journalistic integrity into question, and I had to choke back fightin’ words, as they say, especially after one of the agents warned me that lying was an offense worthy of imprisonment.
That’s where the story ends. I got into Israel and had a wonderful hike through the country. My computer bag was waiting for me on the other side of immigration, and my backpack (apparently cleared of explosives) was delivered to me in Tel Aviv the following day.
The two most effective aspects of the security screening were the initial profiling and the post-flight behavioral interview. The profiling at the front end of the flight was not race-based. I’m a white American male. No flags there. I was targeted because of my colorful passport. After the flight, agents zeroed in on my discomfort and nervousness, singling me out as someone who might have something to hide (albeit incorrectly).
This blog is not an endorsement or a condemnation of the Israeli method. It’s just meant to shine a light on a system that is more effective than ours with regard to security, though it comes at the cost of a more invasive screening process. I hope it will add some perspective to our national conversation as we discuss where on the security-privacy scale we want our air travel to fall.















